Difference between revisions of "Talk:Schemamonk"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article needs to be updated to reflect the the Greek tradition as well. As it is now, it is essentially just representative of the Slavic world. In the Greek tradition (which tends to be much less oriented toward ranks and formalized definitions), the Great Schema (there is no Little Schema) is essentially just the status of a full-fledged monastic. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 15:45, 17 Aug 2005 (EDT) | This article needs to be updated to reflect the the Greek tradition as well. As it is now, it is essentially just representative of the Slavic world. In the Greek tradition (which tends to be much less oriented toward ranks and formalized definitions), the Great Schema (there is no Little Schema) is essentially just the status of a full-fledged monastic. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 15:45, 17 Aug 2005 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Source== | ||
+ | FWIW, http://www.apostle1.com/ is an "independent" group. Also, I'm wondering if we have explicit permission to use this text. — |
Revision as of 20:01, August 17, 2005
This article needs to be updated to reflect the the Greek tradition as well. As it is now, it is essentially just representative of the Slavic world. In the Greek tradition (which tends to be much less oriented toward ranks and formalized definitions), the Great Schema (there is no Little Schema) is essentially just the status of a full-fledged monastic. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 15:45, 17 Aug 2005 (EDT)
Source
FWIW, http://www.apostle1.com/ is an "independent" group. Also, I'm wondering if we have explicit permission to use this text. —