Talk:Romanian Orthodox Episcopate of America (OCA)

From OrthodoxWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Re: Edits by Isturzu)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I've rolled back this article to the previous version by ASDAmick. Insinuations about communist groups and uncanonical bishops need to be better documented, or else they come across as incendiary. Thanks, — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk])
 
I've rolled back this article to the previous version by ASDAmick. Insinuations about communist groups and uncanonical bishops need to be better documented, or else they come across as incendiary. Thanks, — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk])
 +
 +
: This stuff can be documented (I've read some of it), as there are a few books on the Romanian Orthodox groups in the US.  Valerian Trifa in particular was a very interesting and controversial figure.  I don't have the time to do the documentation myself at the moment, though.  Perhaps we could work up and use something like [[w:Template:Fact]] for stuff like this.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 16:55, November 23, 2006 (PST)
 +
 +
::Something like {citation}{{citation}}, perhaps?

Latest revision as of 07:30, November 24, 2006

I've rolled back this article to the previous version by ASDAmick. Insinuations about communist groups and uncanonical bishops need to be better documented, or else they come across as incendiary. Thanks, — FrJohn (talk)

This stuff can be documented (I've read some of it), as there are a few books on the Romanian Orthodox groups in the US. Valerian Trifa in particular was a very interesting and controversial figure. I don't have the time to do the documentation myself at the moment, though. Perhaps we could work up and use something like w:Template:Fact for stuff like this. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 16:55, November 23, 2006 (PST)
Something like {citation}citation needed, perhaps?
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox