Talk:ROCOR and OCA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: Yes, currently, but in '97 it came under ROCOR from the OCA.  I believe they came under Jerusalem just recently.  —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 08:32, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
 
: Yes, currently, but in '97 it came under ROCOR from the OCA.  I believe they came under Jerusalem just recently.  —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 08:32, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: OK, I figured you knew that. Would it be appropriate to acknowledge that in some way? --[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 11:02, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)

Revision as of 08:02, June 16, 2005

Isn't the Monastery of the Glorious Ascension (Resaca, GA) under the Jerusalem Patriarch? --Joe Rodgers 23:46, 15 Jun 2005 (EDT)

Yes, currently, but in '97 it came under ROCOR from the OCA. I believe they came under Jerusalem just recently. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 08:32, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
OK, I figured you knew that. Would it be appropriate to acknowledge that in some way? --Joe Rodgers 11:02, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox