Talk:ROCOR and OCA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Article Size)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
==Article Size==
 
==Article Size==
 
As this is a large article, would it be better to split this article up (similar to what was done to [[Western Rite]])?  Perhaps into 'ROCOR and Metropolia' and 'ROCOR and OCA' sections? --{{User:Pistevo/sig}} 03:02, April 25, 2006 (CDT)
 
As this is a large article, would it be better to split this article up (similar to what was done to [[Western Rite]])?  Perhaps into 'ROCOR and Metropolia' and 'ROCOR and OCA' sections? --{{User:Pistevo/sig}} 03:02, April 25, 2006 (CDT)
 +
 +
: It is somewhat long, though I don't think it is as yet ''too'' long.  I'm also concerned that a split would end up disturbing the narrative coherence too much.  With the WR article, it was more obviously possible, since the period was longer, including a number of smaller stories, and including whole sections of analysis.  {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 06:41, April 25, 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 03:41, April 25, 2006

Ascension Monastery

Isn't the Monastery of the Glorious Ascension (Resaca, GA) under the Jerusalem Patriarch? --Joe Rodgers 23:46, 15 Jun 2005 (EDT)

Yes, currently, but in '97 it came under ROCOR from the OCA. I believe they came under Jerusalem just recently. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 08:32, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
OK, I figured you knew that. Would it be appropriate to acknowledge that in some way? --Joe Rodgers 11:02, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
Perhaps if there were a separate article about that monastery, that would be the place to do it. The reason I'm hesitant to include such information in this article is that the ROCOR/OCA relationship is complicated enough as it is without branching off too much into other histories. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 12:13, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)

Article Size

As this is a large article, would it be better to split this article up (similar to what was done to Western Rite)? Perhaps into 'ROCOR and Metropolia' and 'ROCOR and OCA' sections? --— by Pιsτévο talk complaints at 03:02, April 25, 2006 (CDT)

It is somewhat long, though I don't think it is as yet too long. I'm also concerned that a split would end up disturbing the narrative coherence too much. With the WR article, it was more obviously possible, since the period was longer, including a number of smaller stories, and including whole sections of analysis. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 06:41, April 25, 2006 (CDT)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox