Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michael Shehadie"
m |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The succession box does not make much sense for a parish priest... —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 09:27, May 25, 2006 (CDT) | The succession box does not make much sense for a parish priest... —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 09:27, May 25, 2006 (CDT) | ||
:St George does become a cathedral in the 1980s, so it ''could'' make sense from that perspective... of course, the original intent was to show who the Antiochian exarch of Australasia was... — ''[[User:Pistevo|Pι]]''[[Special:Listusers/sysop|s]]'''[[User talk:Pistevo|τ]]'''[[Special:Contributions/Pistevo|é]]''[[User:Pistevo|vο]]'', at 09:43, May 25, 2006 (CDT) | :St George does become a cathedral in the 1980s, so it ''could'' make sense from that perspective... of course, the original intent was to show who the Antiochian exarch of Australasia was... — ''[[User:Pistevo|Pι]]''[[Special:Listusers/sysop|s]]'''[[User talk:Pistevo|τ]]'''[[Special:Contributions/Pistevo|é]]''[[User:Pistevo|vο]]'', at 09:43, May 25, 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | ::I agree that this article is beneficial and worth keeping (cf [[Talk:Orthodoxy in Australasia#Articles on priests|OiA'asia talk]]), being sizable in both content and quality of subject, being key in the founding of a cathedral. However, a succession box isn't entirely appropriate for a parish priest (as St George's was at that time), and no other priest on OW has a rectorate succession. Perhaps the box should be taken out? — ''[[User:Pistevo|Pι]]''[[Special:Listusers/sysop|s]]'''[[User talk:Pistevo|τ]]'''[[Special:Contributions/Pistevo|é]]''[[User:Pistevo|vο]]'', at 23:59, May 30, 2006 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 05:00, May 31, 2006
The succession box does not make much sense for a parish priest... —magda (talk) 09:27, May 25, 2006 (CDT)
- St George does become a cathedral in the 1980s, so it could make sense from that perspective... of course, the original intent was to show who the Antiochian exarch of Australasia was... — Pιsτévο, at 09:43, May 25, 2006 (CDT)
- I agree that this article is beneficial and worth keeping (cf OiA'asia talk), being sizable in both content and quality of subject, being key in the founding of a cathedral. However, a succession box isn't entirely appropriate for a parish priest (as St George's was at that time), and no other priest on OW has a rectorate succession. Perhaps the box should be taken out? — Pιsτévο, at 23:59, May 30, 2006 (CDT)