Talk:Evangelicus of Tomis

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Should Diocletian be a link or not? I know there's no article as yet, but that's not what I mean. Clearly Diocletian was pagan but, like Nero, I'd argue that he is important to Orthodox history by reason of the fact that he initiated a vicious persecution of Christians. Is that sufficient reason to have an article on him? [[User:James|James]] 05:38, 22 Mar 2005 (CST)
 
Should Diocletian be a link or not? I know there's no article as yet, but that's not what I mean. Clearly Diocletian was pagan but, like Nero, I'd argue that he is important to Orthodox history by reason of the fact that he initiated a vicious persecution of Christians. Is that sufficient reason to have an article on him? [[User:James|James]] 05:38, 22 Mar 2005 (CST)
 +
 +
: Yeah, why not?  --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 06:02, 22 Mar 2005 (CST)

Revision as of 05:02, March 22, 2005

Should Diocletian be a link or not? I know there's no article as yet, but that's not what I mean. Clearly Diocletian was pagan but, like Nero, I'd argue that he is important to Orthodox history by reason of the fact that he initiated a vicious persecution of Christians. Is that sufficient reason to have an article on him? James 05:38, 22 Mar 2005 (CST)

Yeah, why not? --Rdr. Andrew 06:02, 22 Mar 2005 (CST)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox