- Permission granted as long as source continues to be acknowledged. chrisg (antiochian weblord) 2006-06-01-1214 EAST
- Permission extended as long as source continues to be acknowledged. chrisg (webdirector http://www.antiochian.net) 2007-12-05-1016 WAST
In the Bollandists, Ste Geneviève (Genovefa) of Paris, at least in one of the Vitae they give, exorcises demons by oil sanctified by the bishop.
Is there a reliable translation somewhere of the Greek Synod decision? I am curious as to whether they made a distinction between ordination and/ore lay function for deaconesses. AlephGamma 19:01, November 19, 2007 (PST)
Trying to work on the Romanian translation, I checked the links:
The link in the 2nd reference to Russian Holy Synod (sedmitza site) decision appear to be broken. I tried to the antiochian.net article, didn't work.
The two St. Nina links also "not found" (book review and Interview).
Regards. Iuliana 20:41, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
Deaconesses were an order in the Christian Church at least until the middle mediaeval period. Information is sparse as to their activities during those times, though it is clear they were mostly involved with ministering to other women and girls.
It being improper for males to be physically handling women, deaconesses were commissioned to assist especially in baptism and chrismation.
It is an anachronism to say deaconesses did not perform the same liturgical role as deacons in the early church. That is imputing back in time to deacons a role which they were given considerably later in Church history.
In the early Church it is highly likely that deaconesses performed the same liturgical role outside the divine liturgy as deacons, and quite likely more, because of the taboo on (male) priests touching female neophytes, or touching females requiring the sacrament of holy oil for the sick.
It is likely that the actual application of the holy oil onto the body of the women being chrismated was done by the deaconess, and not the priest. The priest did the praying and supervised, but did not touch. Deacons would not have performed this role. As there was no taboo on the priest physically applying the oil to male candidates, there was no need for deacons to be involved in this.
The Japanese Orthodox Church from its inception in the later half of the nineteenth century had some deaconesses. Japan's first bishop, Saint Nicholas Kasatkin, had a number of deaconesses during his tenure.
At the same time, the Russian Orthodox Church, Japan's mother Church, had deaconesses. It seems from the scant material available that the Russian Church has always had deaconesses.
The Greek Orthodox Church has had deaconesses intermittently over the recent centuries, and appears to have usually had deaconesses in its female monasteries from time immemorial.
The Russian Orthodox Church still has deaconesses.
In female monasteries the role of a deaconess seems necessary for the good order and function of the monastery church. It is more seemly than having male deacons involved there.
In 2006, the larger Bulgarian and Romanian monasteries have a deaconess who is usually second in charge. In Romania they wear distinctive garb while performing diaconal duties.
The question of having deaconesses perform the liturgical role of deacons in parish churches or cathedrals could be seen as a different matter since the practice of having deaconesses assist in those places seems to have generally died out in the Byzantine Church about 600 years ago with the inception of the Ottoman yoke.
see also Byzantine Female Deacons
source: http://www.antiochian.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=472&Itemid=21 (link is working fine in this country)