Difference between revisions of "Talk:Clergy awards"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
The article makes little room to discuss the Greek scheme of ecclesiastical awards, and does not even elude to them.  Should a separate article be written or should this one be modified to take acount of the Greek scheme?
+
The article makes little room to discuss the Greek scheme of ecclesiastical awards, and does not even allude to them.  Should a separate article be written or should this one be modified to take account of the Greek scheme?
  
 
: Methinks that this article ought to be broadened and then distinctions made between the various traditions.
 
: Methinks that this article ought to be broadened and then distinctions made between the various traditions.
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
Could we have a link to the document from the Russian Church or at least a proper citation? -Protodn. Kirill
 
Could we have a link to the document from the Russian Church or at least a proper citation? -Protodn. Kirill
 +
 +
:Good idea. I also think we don't need separate articles for the different local traditions. Some more history/context would be great too. — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk])

Revision as of 15:44, November 13, 2006

The article makes little room to discuss the Greek scheme of ecclesiastical awards, and does not even allude to them. Should a separate article be written or should this one be modified to take account of the Greek scheme?

Methinks that this article ought to be broadened and then distinctions made between the various traditions.
P.S. If you have a user account, would you mind signing your posts or at least possibly signing in so that we can know who you are? --Rdr. Andrew 18:23, 8 Feb 2005 (CST)
I'll try and take it a step in that direction with regard to formatting, but I'm not very knowledgable in this area at all. Theophan 22:25, 26 Feb 2005 (CST)

Could we have a link to the document from the Russian Church or at least a proper citation? -Protodn. Kirill

Good idea. I also think we don't need separate articles for the different local traditions. Some more history/context would be great too. — FrJohn (talk)