Talk:Ben Lomond Crisis

From OrthodoxWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (New page: This page was here on Dec 31st, 2007, and removed by someone on Jan 1, 2008. {{unsigned|JulianDelphiki}} :This is interesting. There's nothing here for this page on the [http://web.archi...)
 
(Typo?)
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page was here on Dec 31st, 2007, and removed by someone on Jan 1, 2008. {{unsigned|JulianDelphiki}}
+
[[Talk:Ben_Lomond_Crisis/Archives 1|Archives 1]] - Creation to Protection of article.
  
:This is interesting.  There's nothing here for this page on the [http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://orthodoxwiki.org/Ben_Lomond_Crisis internet archive] (dated November 18, 2005)There doesn't seem to be a Google cache for the page.  There are three articles linking to the page, but Google's cache of those articles (on [http://209.85.207.104/search?q=cache:ixZY2Qdg7FYJ:orthodoxwiki.org/Timeline_of_Orthodoxy_in_America December 23], [http://209.85.207.104/search?q=cache:SykpLUe6-lcJ:orthodoxwiki.org/Philip_(Saliba)_of_New_York 24], and [http://209.85.207.104/search?q=cache:XPou7Cbsh7wJ:orthodoxwiki.org/Greek_Orthodox_Patriarchate_of_Jerusalem_in_North_and_South_America 30] indicate that Google didn't see the page on those dates. It doesn't appear that anyone actually removed the page, or there would have been something in the [http://orthodoxwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Ben_Lomond_Crisis logs], so I'm baffled as to what happened. [[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 09:03, January 2, 2008 (PST)
+
==Additions to article==
 +
Have added a citation to the Archbishop's archpastoral directive (which was the suspension of the clergy), and ideally, would like to add citations to articles posted on Ben Lomond TragedyAlthough the sources are proper for encyclopaedic articles, based on new articles that have been posted there, I'd want a consensus to add such citations.  &mdash; edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 02:03, January 28, 2008 (PST)
 +
 
 +
Pending any objections, I'll put a link up to Dcn R. Thomas Zell's article on this, written in the first AGAIN magazine post-court verdict.  It's viewable [http://z6.invisionfree.com/On_Our_Way_Home/index.php?showtopic=157&st=78 here] (about eight screens down), and I'm not sure where else it might be available.  At some point, any additional points from this article should be added in to the article itself.
 +
 
 +
Anyone think that this should be unprotected, or is it just going to be a permanently touchy subject until all the key players are out of the Church Militant? &mdash; by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 20:34, March 5, 2008 (PST)
 +
 
 +
==Typo? ==
 +
 
 +
Feel free to remove this section once dealt with (including if you choose not to deal with it).
 +
 
 +
1.  While not specifically a typo, the third sentence of the first bullet could be cleaned up by not using the word "period" an extra time.
 +
 
 +
2.  Minor beef, but should we adjust British spellings (e.g., "practise") in an article about an innately American episode?  I honestly don't know if there's a wiki standard for use of English (US vs. UK).  If there is none, then please, allow me to sit down and shut up.
 +
 
 +
Let me also thank you for this article.  I'm reaching a point now where I need a good understanding of what happened just so I don't stick my foot in my mouth while discussing it with others. I really hate controversy. It makes me break out in hives.
 +
 
 +
[[User:Jeffholton|Theophilus]] 23:14, May 3, 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:14, May 3, 2009

Archives 1 - Creation to Protection of article.

Additions to article

Have added a citation to the Archbishop's archpastoral directive (which was the suspension of the clergy), and ideally, would like to add citations to articles posted on Ben Lomond Tragedy. Although the sources are proper for encyclopaedic articles, based on new articles that have been posted there, I'd want a consensus to add such citations. — edited by Pιsτévο talk complaints at 02:03, January 28, 2008 (PST)

Pending any objections, I'll put a link up to Dcn R. Thomas Zell's article on this, written in the first AGAIN magazine post-court verdict. It's viewable here (about eight screens down), and I'm not sure where else it might be available. At some point, any additional points from this article should be added in to the article itself.

Anyone think that this should be unprotected, or is it just going to be a permanently touchy subject until all the key players are out of the Church Militant? — by Pιsτévο talk complaints at 20:34, March 5, 2008 (PST)

Typo?

Feel free to remove this section once dealt with (including if you choose not to deal with it).

1. While not specifically a typo, the third sentence of the first bullet could be cleaned up by not using the word "period" an extra time.

2. Minor beef, but should we adjust British spellings (e.g., "practise") in an article about an innately American episode? I honestly don't know if there's a wiki standard for use of English (US vs. UK). If there is none, then please, allow me to sit down and shut up.

Let me also thank you for this article. I'm reaching a point now where I need a good understanding of what happened just so I don't stick my foot in my mouth while discussing it with others. I really hate controversy. It makes me break out in hives.

Theophilus 23:14, May 3, 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox