Talk:Archangel

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
(In other words : "Is this trip really necessary ?"). The answer is : No, Heaven forbid ! By doing this I just wanted to bring somehow in evidence their synoyms. (For instance -maybe that's not just the best example-, I was aware of Gudiil, but it took me quite a moment to figure out who exactly Jehudiel was ... ). And putting them in bold or in italics didn't seem (at all) as such a good ideea.
 
(In other words : "Is this trip really necessary ?"). The answer is : No, Heaven forbid ! By doing this I just wanted to bring somehow in evidence their synoyms. (For instance -maybe that's not just the best example-, I was aware of Gudiil, but it took me quite a moment to figure out who exactly Jehudiel was ... ). And putting them in bold or in italics didn't seem (at all) as such a good ideea.
 +
 +
: I have no problem with listing them, but it seems that making separate articles for each variant is redundant.  Perhaps just a list of the names without links would be best.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 19:55, May 30, 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:55, May 30, 2006

Linking all the various names for each of these archangels seems to suggest that we should have separate articles for each variant. Is that really necessary? —Dcn. Andrew talk random contribs 15:01, May 30, 2006 (CDT)


(In other words : "Is this trip really necessary ?"). The answer is : No, Heaven forbid ! By doing this I just wanted to bring somehow in evidence their synoyms. (For instance -maybe that's not just the best example-, I was aware of Gudiil, but it took me quite a moment to figure out who exactly Jehudiel was ... ). And putting them in bold or in italics didn't seem (at all) as such a good ideea.

I have no problem with listing them, but it seems that making separate articles for each variant is redundant. Perhaps just a list of the names without links would be best. —Dcn. Andrew talk random contribs 19:55, May 30, 2006 (CDT)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox