Talk:Archangel

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
-----
 
-----
  
(In other words : "Is this trip really necessary ?"). The answer is : No, Heaven forbid ! By doing this I just wanted to bring somehow in evidence their synoyms. (For instance -maybe that's not just the best example-, I was aware of Gudiil, but it took me quite a moment to figure out who exactly Jehudiel was ... ). And putting them in bold or in italics didn't seem such a good ideea.
+
(In other words : "Is this trip really necessary ?"). The answer is : No, Heaven forbid ! By doing this I just wanted to bring somehow in evidence their synoyms. (For instance -maybe that's not just the best example-, I was aware of Gudiil, but it took me quite a moment to figure out who exactly Jehudiel was ... ). And putting them in bold or in italics didn't seem (at all) as such a good ideea.

Revision as of 16:23, May 30, 2006

Linking all the various names for each of these archangels seems to suggest that we should have separate articles for each variant. Is that really necessary? —Dcn. Andrew talk random contribs 15:01, May 30, 2006 (CDT)


(In other words : "Is this trip really necessary ?"). The answer is : No, Heaven forbid ! By doing this I just wanted to bring somehow in evidence their synoyms. (For instance -maybe that's not just the best example-, I was aware of Gudiil, but it took me quite a moment to figure out who exactly Jehudiel was ... ). And putting them in bold or in italics didn't seem (at all) as such a good ideea.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox