Talk:Aftimios Ofiesh

From OrthodoxWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Masculine and feminine==
 
==Masculine and feminine==
Just FYI:  ''n&;eacute;e'' is the feminine form, while ''n&;eacute;'' is the masculine.  See [[Wikipedia:Née]].  --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 08:36, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
+
Just FYI:  ''née'' is the feminine form, while ''né'' is the masculine.  See [[Wikipedia:Née]].  --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 08:36, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
::Sounds good. Thanks for the clarification! [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]
 +
 
 +
==Sources==
 +
I reverted the change to the "Sources" link, as the new link is in fact not one of the sources used in writing the article, whereas the old link was.  --[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 08:21, 8 Jun 2005 (CDT)
 +
 
 +
== Pure Spite ==
 +
 
 +
I believe that the changing of the link of the Ancient Apostolic Communion to include the extra links to papers on our site was a gesture of pure spite by the admin. --[[User:Patriarchanthony|Patriarchanthony]] 20:01, December 3, 2005 (CST)
 +
 
 +
: It was a gesture of pure documentation, referencing clearly relevant, public files.  {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 20:48, December 3, 2005 (CST)
 +
 
 +
I see your point and I thank you for your work. The publicity is much appreciated. --[[User:Patriarchanthony|Patriarchanthony]] 21:14, December 3, 2005 (CST)

Latest revision as of 20:14, December 3, 2005

Masculine and feminine

Just FYI: née is the feminine form, while is the masculine. See Wikipedia:Née. --Rdr. Andrew 08:36, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Sounds good. Thanks for the clarification! Fr. John

Sources

I reverted the change to the "Sources" link, as the new link is in fact not one of the sources used in writing the article, whereas the old link was. --[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 08:21, 8 Jun 2005 (CDT)

Pure Spite

I believe that the changing of the link of the Ancient Apostolic Communion to include the extra links to papers on our site was a gesture of pure spite by the admin. --Patriarchanthony 20:01, December 3, 2005 (CST)

It was a gesture of pure documentation, referencing clearly relevant, public files. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 20:48, December 3, 2005 (CST)

I see your point and I thank you for your work. The publicity is much appreciated. --Patriarchanthony 21:14, December 3, 2005 (CST)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox