Episcopi vagantes

From OrthodoxWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(added "See also")
(category)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''Episcopi vagantes''''' (Latin for "wandering bishops") are persons who have been [[ordination|ordained]] as [[bishop]]s in some irregular fashion, especially those claiming to have valid [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] orders although their ordinations were not authorized by the Roman Catholic Church.  (The singular form of the phrase is ''episcopus vagans''.)
+
'''''Episcopi vagantes''''' (Latin for "wandering bishops") are persons who have been [[ordination|ordained]] as [[bishop]]s in some irregular fashion, especially those claiming to have valid [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] orders although their ordinations were not authorized by the Roman Catholic Church.  (The singular form of the phrase is ''episcopus vagans''.) They may be involved in running [[independent Orthodox churches]].
  
 +
==View of consecrations done by episcopi vagantes==
 
The Vatican considers some such ordinations "valid" but "unlawful," but the Orthodox Church considers them simply not to be ordinations and thus also considers persons so ordained not to be bishops at all.  This is because unlike the Vatican, it considers [[apostolic succession]] to exist only in bishops who are regularily ordained by bishops that are neither themselves defrocked, nor teach heretical teachings.  Holy Orders are not regarded by the Orthodox as "indelible," thus if a bishop breaks from the Church, his episcopacy (and thus his ability to ordain) does not follow him.
 
The Vatican considers some such ordinations "valid" but "unlawful," but the Orthodox Church considers them simply not to be ordinations and thus also considers persons so ordained not to be bishops at all.  This is because unlike the Vatican, it considers [[apostolic succession]] to exist only in bishops who are regularily ordained by bishops that are neither themselves defrocked, nor teach heretical teachings.  Holy Orders are not regarded by the Orthodox as "indelible," thus if a bishop breaks from the Church, his episcopacy (and thus his ability to ordain) does not follow him.
  
 
Many of these claim succession from the see of Utrecht, or from Orthodox or [[Eastern Rite Catholic]] churches; others from Roman Catholic bishops that have ordained their own bishops after disputes with the Vatican.  Such lines continue to persist because of the more mechanistic understanding of apostolic succession which the Roman Catholic Church has—that is, if a "valid" bishop ordains a man using the proper rituals, then he is "valid" as well, even if neither has any living connection to the Church.  The Orthodox understanding, however, necessarily presupposes the impossibility of ''episcopi'' that are ''vagantes'', for the ministry of the episcopacy resides only ''within'' the Church.
 
Many of these claim succession from the see of Utrecht, or from Orthodox or [[Eastern Rite Catholic]] churches; others from Roman Catholic bishops that have ordained their own bishops after disputes with the Vatican.  Such lines continue to persist because of the more mechanistic understanding of apostolic succession which the Roman Catholic Church has—that is, if a "valid" bishop ordains a man using the proper rituals, then he is "valid" as well, even if neither has any living connection to the Church.  The Orthodox understanding, however, necessarily presupposes the impossibility of ''episcopi'' that are ''vagantes'', for the ministry of the episcopacy resides only ''within'' the Church.
  
 +
==Behavior==
 
Many ''episcopi vagantes'' will style their churches variously as ''Orthodox'', ''Catholic'', ''Apostolic'', or any of the other historical names used by the Church.  Attempting to trace their roots, delineate one group from another, or easily identify them as being ''episcopi vagantes'' can be a difficult matter, especially because such groups seem to be subject to internal [[schism]]s and name changes.  One indication often pointed out about the webpages of such groups is that they often have a list of their alleged apostolic succession displayed prominently up front and/or lengthy insistence on their legal ownership of various registered trademarks (usually the group's name).
 
Many ''episcopi vagantes'' will style their churches variously as ''Orthodox'', ''Catholic'', ''Apostolic'', or any of the other historical names used by the Church.  Attempting to trace their roots, delineate one group from another, or easily identify them as being ''episcopi vagantes'' can be a difficult matter, especially because such groups seem to be subject to internal [[schism]]s and name changes.  One indication often pointed out about the webpages of such groups is that they often have a list of their alleged apostolic succession displayed prominently up front and/or lengthy insistence on their legal ownership of various registered trademarks (usually the group's name).
  
In terms of their self-understanding, ''episcopi vagantes'' groups can vary from regarding themselves as the only legitimate church for a particular region or ethnicity to a sort of Protestant pluralist perspective in which all groups with "apostolic succession" (including themselves) are regarded as legitimately "Catholic," "Orthodox," "Christian," "Church," "Apostolic," etc.  Usually, however, the mainstream claimants to these labels (e.g., the [[Orthodox Church]], the [[Roman Catholic Church]], or the [[Anglican Communion]]) do not regard these groups as legitimate claimants to such titles and are not in [[full communion]] with them.  Occasionally, such a group will enter into communion with the Church, as the [[Society of Clerks Secular of St. Basil]] did with the [[Church of Antioch]] in 1961.
+
In modern times, some of the major lines of ''episcopi vagantes'' trace their succession to A. H. Mathew (deposed from the Old Catholics), J. R. Vilatte (variously Roman Catholic, Old Catholic, and with a line from a [[Church of Antioch (Syriac)|Syriac Orthodox]] metropolitan, [[Julius of Goa|Alvares Mar Julius]]), and [[Aftimios Ofiesh]], a 20th century Syrian bishop serving under the auspices of the [[Church of Russia]] in America, who no longer served in the episcopacy (whether through [[deposition]], retirement, or resignation) after marrying a woman under his pastoral care.  An additional telltale sign for these groups is a presentation of extensive documents insisting on their "canonicity."
 
+
In modern times, some of the major lines of ''episcopi vagantes'' trace their succession to A. H. Mathew (deposed from the Old Catholics), J. R. Vilatte (variously Roman Catholic, Old Catholic, and with an alleged line from a [[Oriental Orthodox|non-Chalcedonian]] [[Church of Antioch (Jacobite)|Syrian]] bishop), and [[Aftimios Ofiesh]], a 20th century Syrian bishop serving under the auspices of the [[Church of Russia]] in America, who no longer served in the episcopacy (whether through deposition, retirement, or resignation) after marrying a woman under his pastoral care.  An additional telltale sign for these groups is a presentation of extensive documents insisting on their "canonicity."
+
  
 
==Other issues==
 
==Other issues==
 
*Many people have claimed ordinations as bishops where it is questionable whether the ordination ever actually took place, which is a separate issue.
 
*Many people have claimed ordinations as bishops where it is questionable whether the ordination ever actually took place, which is a separate issue.
 
 
*Further, bishops belonging to groups which are in [[schism]] (i.e., out of [[full communion]]) from the Church or have suspended [[concelebration]]s are not ''episcopi vagantes'' inasmuch as their consecrations as bishops were clearly within the Church and the break in communion may well only be temporary.
 
*Further, bishops belonging to groups which are in [[schism]] (i.e., out of [[full communion]]) from the Church or have suspended [[concelebration]]s are not ''episcopi vagantes'' inasmuch as their consecrations as bishops were clearly within the Church and the break in communion may well only be temporary.
 +
* Many (Western, schismatic, especially Anglican-descdent) groups use the traditional/scholastic Roman Catholic distinction between licit and valid orders, tracing a history of ordinations, as a way of claiming legitmacy. The Orthodox church does not generally adopt this distinction. Epsicopal consecration is only valid and licit (to use Scholastic terminology) when in communion with the other Orthodox churches around the world. There has, however, been some flexibilty in understanding in certain cases of schism. (The Roman Catholic distinction can be read as an attempt to bring canonical order to the "gray areas" of ecclesiology).
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
[[Independent Orthodox churches]]
+
*[[Independent Orthodox churches]]
  
 
==Sources==
 
==Sources==
Line 29: Line 29:
 
*[http://www.independentmovement.us/ Independent Movement Database]
 
*[http://www.independentmovement.us/ Independent Movement Database]
 
*[http://www.orgsites.com/pa/abs/ Autocephalous Society of Bishops]
 
*[http://www.orgsites.com/pa/abs/ Autocephalous Society of Bishops]
 +
*[http://www.angelfire.com/on3/Database/ Database of Autocephalous Bishops]
  
 
[[Category:Bishops]]
 
[[Category:Bishops]]
 
[[Category:Clergy]]
 
[[Category:Clergy]]
 +
[[Category: Schisms]]
 
[[Category:Ecclesiology]]
 
[[Category:Ecclesiology]]
 +
[[Category:Featured Articles]]

Latest revision as of 17:44, April 26, 2011

Episcopi vagantes (Latin for "wandering bishops") are persons who have been ordained as bishops in some irregular fashion, especially those claiming to have valid Roman Catholic orders although their ordinations were not authorized by the Roman Catholic Church. (The singular form of the phrase is episcopus vagans.) They may be involved in running independent Orthodox churches.

Contents

View of consecrations done by episcopi vagantes

The Vatican considers some such ordinations "valid" but "unlawful," but the Orthodox Church considers them simply not to be ordinations and thus also considers persons so ordained not to be bishops at all. This is because unlike the Vatican, it considers apostolic succession to exist only in bishops who are regularily ordained by bishops that are neither themselves defrocked, nor teach heretical teachings. Holy Orders are not regarded by the Orthodox as "indelible," thus if a bishop breaks from the Church, his episcopacy (and thus his ability to ordain) does not follow him.

Many of these claim succession from the see of Utrecht, or from Orthodox or Eastern Rite Catholic churches; others from Roman Catholic bishops that have ordained their own bishops after disputes with the Vatican. Such lines continue to persist because of the more mechanistic understanding of apostolic succession which the Roman Catholic Church has—that is, if a "valid" bishop ordains a man using the proper rituals, then he is "valid" as well, even if neither has any living connection to the Church. The Orthodox understanding, however, necessarily presupposes the impossibility of episcopi that are vagantes, for the ministry of the episcopacy resides only within the Church.

Behavior

Many episcopi vagantes will style their churches variously as Orthodox, Catholic, Apostolic, or any of the other historical names used by the Church. Attempting to trace their roots, delineate one group from another, or easily identify them as being episcopi vagantes can be a difficult matter, especially because such groups seem to be subject to internal schisms and name changes. One indication often pointed out about the webpages of such groups is that they often have a list of their alleged apostolic succession displayed prominently up front and/or lengthy insistence on their legal ownership of various registered trademarks (usually the group's name).

In modern times, some of the major lines of episcopi vagantes trace their succession to A. H. Mathew (deposed from the Old Catholics), J. R. Vilatte (variously Roman Catholic, Old Catholic, and with a line from a Syriac Orthodox metropolitan, Alvares Mar Julius), and Aftimios Ofiesh, a 20th century Syrian bishop serving under the auspices of the Church of Russia in America, who no longer served in the episcopacy (whether through deposition, retirement, or resignation) after marrying a woman under his pastoral care. An additional telltale sign for these groups is a presentation of extensive documents insisting on their "canonicity."

Other issues

  • Many people have claimed ordinations as bishops where it is questionable whether the ordination ever actually took place, which is a separate issue.
  • Further, bishops belonging to groups which are in schism (i.e., out of full communion) from the Church or have suspended concelebrations are not episcopi vagantes inasmuch as their consecrations as bishops were clearly within the Church and the break in communion may well only be temporary.
  • Many (Western, schismatic, especially Anglican-descdent) groups use the traditional/scholastic Roman Catholic distinction between licit and valid orders, tracing a history of ordinations, as a way of claiming legitmacy. The Orthodox church does not generally adopt this distinction. Epsicopal consecration is only valid and licit (to use Scholastic terminology) when in communion with the other Orthodox churches around the world. There has, however, been some flexibilty in understanding in certain cases of schism. (The Roman Catholic distinction can be read as an attempt to bring canonical order to the "gray areas" of ecclesiology).

See also

Sources

External links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox