Category talk:Non-Orthodox

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I see a serious problem with ''most'' of the articles in this category right now, as they don't qualify for the Style Manual's stipulation that such articles be mainly about the group's relation to the Orthodox Church.  That is, they should read as though the article title is "Group X and the Orthodox Church."
 
I see a serious problem with ''most'' of the articles in this category right now, as they don't qualify for the Style Manual's stipulation that such articles be mainly about the group's relation to the Orthodox Church.  That is, they should read as though the article title is "Group X and the Orthodox Church."
  
I'm tagging all the articles that are questionable.  I propose that they either get deleted or completely revamped.  {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 16:54, January 11, 2006 (CST)
+
I'm tagging all the articles that are questionable.  I propose that they either get deleted or completely revamped.  The ones on [[John Paul II]] and the [[Rosary]] are almost the only ones which fulfil the requirement.  {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 16:54, January 11, 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 15:02, January 11, 2006

I see a serious problem with most of the articles in this category right now, as they don't qualify for the Style Manual's stipulation that such articles be mainly about the group's relation to the Orthodox Church. That is, they should read as though the article title is "Group X and the Orthodox Church."

I'm tagging all the articles that are questionable. I propose that they either get deleted or completely revamped. The ones on John Paul II and the Rosary are almost the only ones which fulfil the requirement. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 16:54, January 11, 2006 (CST)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox