Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Contributed Articles"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: A fine idea! {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 12:13, May 8, 2006 (CDT) | : A fine idea! {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 12:13, May 8, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It has been proposed to move all articles in this category to [http://www.orthodoxsource.org/ OrthodoxSource]. Comments? —[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 17:05, June 10, 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:05, June 10, 2006
Might it be a good idea to have a template to clarify that these are contributed articles (rather than encyclopedic articles)? There was some confusion over one example. —magda (talk) 11:43, May 8, 2006 (CDT)
- A fine idea! —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 12:13, May 8, 2006 (CDT)
It has been proposed to move all articles in this category to OrthodoxSource. Comments? —Dcn. Andrew talk random contribs 17:05, June 10, 2006 (CDT)
