Category talk:Church Fathers

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
:::rather than remove them - recategorise them on the same page so that the information is not lost and it is clear that they are not considered Church Fathers as such by the EO however that they are in that category. [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 21:51, March 17, 2009 (UTC)
 
:::rather than remove them - recategorise them on the same page so that the information is not lost and it is clear that they are not considered Church Fathers as such by the EO however that they are in that category. [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 21:51, March 17, 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
::::How can it be made clear that these figures are not recognized by the EO while still to grouping them within the Church Fathers. I was thinking of making a new page called "Non-Chalcedonian Fathers" and placing it as a subcategory of "Church Fathers", but that also seems a little off, doesn't it? [[User:Deusveritasest|Deusveritasest]] 21:57, March 17, 2009 (UTC)
  
 
== Isaac the Syrian ==
 
== Isaac the Syrian ==
  
 
I have no clue where Isaac the Syrian should be. He obviously wasn't part of the Chalcedonian Orthodox Church, but at the same time he has received varying degrees of recognition within the EOC. [[User:Deusveritasest|Deusveritasest]] 21:53, March 17, 2009 (UTC)
 
I have no clue where Isaac the Syrian should be. He obviously wasn't part of the Chalcedonian Orthodox Church, but at the same time he has received varying degrees of recognition within the EOC. [[User:Deusveritasest|Deusveritasest]] 21:53, March 17, 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:57, March 17, 2009

Non-Chalcedonian Fathers

Is it appropriate for Fathers particular to the Non-Chalcedonian tradition (Jacob of Serugh, Severus of Antioch, etc.) to be listed in the Church Fathers category here on Orthodox Wiki? Deusveritasest 06:06, March 17, 2009 (UTC)

No, it's not. (This is not a comment on their holiness, etc., just a matter of the way we've set policy.) —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 11:29, March 17, 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I'll make a point of removing them. Deusveritasest 21:48, March 17, 2009 (UTC)
rather than remove them - recategorise them on the same page so that the information is not lost and it is clear that they are not considered Church Fathers as such by the EO however that they are in that category. Vasiliki 21:51, March 17, 2009 (UTC)
How can it be made clear that these figures are not recognized by the EO while still to grouping them within the Church Fathers. I was thinking of making a new page called "Non-Chalcedonian Fathers" and placing it as a subcategory of "Church Fathers", but that also seems a little off, doesn't it? Deusveritasest 21:57, March 17, 2009 (UTC)

Isaac the Syrian

I have no clue where Isaac the Syrian should be. He obviously wasn't part of the Chalcedonian Orthodox Church, but at the same time he has received varying degrees of recognition within the EOC. Deusveritasest 21:53, March 17, 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox