Open main menu

OrthodoxWiki β

Changes

User talk:Joe Rodgers

1,246 bytes added, 13:25, January 19, 2011
no edit summary
== Talk pages [[Deanery]] ==
Were you aware that your source (La Crosse) is Roman Catholic? I don't much mind what you do with your own Talk pageknow whether it makes any difference in the definition of a deanery, but would you mind not erasing those of other articles? It's helpful to see where we've been and why we've done what we've doneI thought I should point it out anyway. {{User:Magda/sig}} 07:41, January 19, 2006 (CST)
(Please forgive me if :Yes I was. I am certainly not against Catholic, Protestant, or anything for that matter, when it coincides with truth. I seem needling was not able to find a reasonable online source from an Orthodox perspective and naggingthought that these words were appropriate for Orthodox deaneries as well.) —[[User:ASDamickJoe Rodgers|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}Joe]] 17:47, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)20060119
: I will gladly abide by the decision of the sysops. What is everyone else's opinion? I talked with another sysop (I won't mention their name) who seemed to agree that things get a little cluttered, cloudy, or outdated in discussion pages.== Pic ==
: My own thoughts are that if articles can be trimmed and made more concise, why can't talk pages? I like having an archive, but if a situation has been addressed then I personally think it makes things cluttered Nice to keep them around. The discussion is archived in the changelog/history. My two cents. --[[see you Joe! {{User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 18:54, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)FrJohn/sig}}
Wikipedia's usual approach (not that we have And you know, somehow I thought you were older than you appear to do everything they dobe. :) is to make archival subpages when the given talk page gets too long. Sorting through a history can be extremely difficult and time consuming{{User:ASDamick/sig}} 16:39, January 19, especially if one isn't looking for something in particular but rather simply wants to know what the discussion regarding a given article has been.2006 (CST)
I don't think == Menologion ==Joe, this has ever been discussed between the sysopsis Aleks. Igot you message recently. Can you elaborate in an e-mail on what exactly you'm just ''one'' of them re interested in making? I think it would be great to have Menologion and by no means chief among them. We can certainly put it up for discussion, thoughOW work together, which but I've done on [[OrthodoxWiki:Administrators]]want to figure out the logistics first. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 19:09, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
== Hi ==Dear Joe, Thanks (belatedly) for your welcome note!Best, [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 12:39, June 28, 2006 (CDT) == Your sig == I think one reason 've noticed that your sig isn't coming out quite right when you sign posts. If you want to keep use the template approach, you'll need to check the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box in your preferences on the "User profile" tab. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 15:23, August 10, 2006 (CDT) == IRC Channel still up? == Hi Joe, I just checked up on the IRC channel and I received the following messages::ChanServ changed this room to require operator status to change the topic. (11:46AM)<br>[11:46AM] ChanServ made this room no longer a record of resolved issues secret. (11:46AM) <br>[11:46AM] You were demoted from operator by ChanServ. (11:46AM) <br> Given my IRC inexperience, maybe this is nothing to worry about - just normal, but I wanted to make sure our channel is still up and running in good standing, not quashed due to inactivity. What is that others who think of similar the freenode policy on this?  Thanks! — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk]) 09:49, May 26, 2007 (or the samePDT) issues can see for themselves that it has been resolved == Active appeal == There's currently an active appeal over at [[OrthodoxWiki talk:Administrators]]. If as an admin, you would like to participate, without having please feel free to rehash argumentsdo so. Thanks! &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, for instance when a style decision has been madeGaramond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:MagdaASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|magdaTHINK!]] 20''')</font></small> 16:2701, August 19, 28 Jun 2005 2008 (EDTUTC)  == Hi, I'm Italian == I hope in Orthodox in Italian... i'll writing in Italian... about Ortodossia!!
292
edits